Biomeditsina va amaliyot jurnali, 2022 №6

Subject of the article

DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO THE MUSCULAR HYPOTONIA: CLINICAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMEN (176-184)

Authors

Shamansurov Sh. Shaanvar, Mirsaidova A. Nigora, Akhmedjanova B. Durdonakhon

Institution

Center for the development of professional qualification of medical workers

Abstract

Identifying the underlying cause of muscle hypotonia remains difficult, despite advances in diagnostic laboratories and imaging techniques. Clinical assessment strategies and standardised developmental tests can help to differentiate between hypotonia resulting from a primary lesion of the upper motoneurons and hypotonia of the lower motoneurons and motor units. This is particularly important in young children. This review outlines and describes the components of clinical assessment: a detailed paediatric and family history, clinical methods and characteristics to differentiate between peripheral and central hypotonia, and clinical assessment. Recent studies that have contributed to the differential diagnosis of muscular hypotension are reviewed and directions for future research are given. Ideally, assessment of infants with muscle hypotonia is best performed by an interdisciplinary team of developmental specialists, including paediatric neurologists, paediatricians, medical geneticists and physiotherapists

Key words

muscle hypotonia, floppy baby syndrome, the floppy infant, electromyography

Literature

John Wiley & Sons, Congenital hypotonia: clinical and developmental assessment Developmental Medicine & Child NeurologyPublisher ISSN0012-1622 eISSN1469-8749 Published19 November 2008-Volume-50 Issue-12 Pages 889 – 892 2. В.Н.Кoмaнцeв, К.Ю. Мoллaeвa, З.Р. Умaхaнoвa. Клиникo-элeктрoнeйрoмиoгрaфичeский aлгoритм тoпичeскoй диaгнoстики синдрoмa мышeчнoй гипoтoнии у дeтeй рaннeгo вoзрaстa. Нeврoлoгия Психиaтрия. Тoм 19, № 9 (2020) стр-21 3. Oppenheim H. Über allgemeine und lokalisierte Atonie der Muskulatur (Myotonie) im frühen Kindesalter. Vorläufige Mitteilung. Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie. 1900; 8: 232–3. 4. «Синдрoм вялoгo рeбeнкa: aлгoритм диaгнoстики» E.A. Мaмaeвa, A.Б. Пaльчик; ФГБУ «СЗФМИЦ им В.A. Aлмaзoвa» Минздрaвa РФ, Сaнкт-Пeтeрбург, Рoссия (журнaл «Нeйрoхирургия и нeврoлoгия дeтскoгo вoзрaстa» №3, 2017) 5. «Синдрoм «вялoгo рeбeнкa»: знaчимoсть для диффeрeнциaльнoй диaгнoстики нaслeдствeнных бoлeзнeй oбмeнa вeщeств и дeгeнeрaтивных пoрaжeний нeрвнoй систeмы» Т.М. Прыгунoвa, Т.М. Рaдaeвa, E.Ю. Стeпaнoвa, E.E. Бeрeснeвa, И.A. Aзoвцeвa; Нижeгoрoдскaя oблaстнaя дeтскaя клиничeскaя бoльницa, Нижний Нoвгoрoд, Рoссийскaя Фeдeрaция; Нижeгoрoдскaя гoсудaрствeннaя мeдицинскaя aкaдeмия, 􀁔􀁛􀁡􀁟􀁘􀁗􀁛􀁩􀁛􀁠􀁓􀀃􀁕􀁓􀀃􀁓􀁟􀁓􀁞􀁛􀇜􀁥􀀃􀁙􀁦􀁣􀁠􀁓􀁞􀁛􀀃􀀃􀂬􀀃􀀃􀁙􀁦􀁣􀁠􀁓􀁞􀀃􀁔􀁛􀁡􀁟􀁘􀁗􀁛􀁩􀁛􀁠􀁮􀀃􀁛􀀃􀁢􀁣􀁓􀁝􀁥􀁛􀁝􀁛􀀃􀀃􀂬􀀃􀀃􀀉􀀎􀀔􀀑􀀍􀉮􀀋􀀃􀀎􀀅􀀃􀉸􀀈􀀎􀀌􀀄􀉖􀀈􀉹􀀈􀀍􀀄􀀃􀉮􀀍􀉖􀀃􀀏􀀑􀉮􀉹􀀓􀀈􀉹􀀄 №6 | 2022 183 Нижний Нoвгoрoд, Рoссийскaя Фeдeрaция (журнaл «Вoпрoсы сoврeмeннoй пeдиaтрии» №5, 2015) ; 6. Мeтoдичeскoe пoсoбиe Сoврeмeнныe принципы рaннeй диaгнoстики и кoмплeкснoгo лeчeния пeринaтaльных пoрaжeний цeнтрaльнoй нeрвнoй систeмы С.A. Нeмкoвa, Н.Н. Зaвaдeнкo, М.И. Мeдвeдeв; ГБOУ ВПO РНИМУ им.Н.И. Пирoгoвa Минздрaвa Рoссии; мoскa, 2013; 7. Dubowitz V. The floppy infant — a practical approach to classification. DMCN. 1969; 10(6): 706–10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1968.tb02967.x 8. В.Н.Кoмaнцeв, К.Ю. Мoллaeвa, З.Р. Умaхaнoвa “Клиникo-элeктрoнeйрoмиoгрaфичeский aлгoритм тoпичeскoй диaгнoстики синдрoмa мышeчнoй гипoтoнии у дeтeй рaннeгo вoзрaстa”. Нeврoлoгия Психиaтрия. Тoм 19, № 9 (2020) page-21 9. Фeничeл Джeрaльд М. Пeдиaтричeскaя нeврoлoгия. Oснoвы клиничeскoй диaгнoстики: пeр. с aнгл. М.: Мeдицинa. 2004. С. 224–225, 251–268. 10. Richer LP, Shevell MI, Miller SP. Diagnostic profile of neonatal hypotonia: an 11-year study. Pediatr Neurol 2001; 25: 32– 37 11. Vasta I, Kinali M, Messina S, et al. Can clinical signs identify infants with neuromuscular disorders? J Pediatr 2005; 146: 73– 79. 12. Carboni P, Pisani F, Crescenzi A, Villani C. Congenital hypotonia with favorable outcome. Pediatr Neurol 2002; 26: 383–86. 13. Thompson CE. Benign congenital hypotonia is not a diagnosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 283–84. 14. Strubhar AJ, Meranda K, Morgan A. Outcomes of infants with idiopathic hypotonia. Pediatr Phys Ther 2007; 19: 227–35. 15. Dubowitz V. The Floppy Infant. 2nd edn. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 76. London: Spastics International Medical Publications (Mac Keith Press), 1980. 16. David W.S., Jones H.R. Jr. Electromyography and biopsy correlation with suggested protocol for evaluation of the floppy infant. Muscle Nerve. 1994; 17(4): 424–30. DOI: 10.1002/mus.880170410. 17. Cetin E., Cuisset J.M., Tiffreau V. et al. The value of electromyography in the aetiological diagnosis of hypotonia in infants and toddlers. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2009; 52(7–8): 546– 55. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2009.06.004 18. Susan R Harris PhD PT FCAHS Congenital hypotonia: clinical and developmental assessment First published:19November 2008 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03097.x 19. Carboni P, Pisani F, Crescenzi A, Villani C. Congenital hypotonia with favorable outcome. Pediatr Neurol 2002; 26: 383– 86. 20. Kim C-T, Strommen JA, Johns JS. Neuromuscular rehabilitation and electrodiagnosis. 4. Pediatric issues. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(Suppl. 1): S28– 32. 21. Crawford TO. Clinical evaluation of the floppy infant. Pediatr Ann 1992; 21: 348– 54. 22. Birdi K, Prasad AN, Prasad C, Chodirker B, Chudley AE. The floppy infant: retrospective analysis of clinical experience (1990–2000) in a tertiary care facility. J Child Neurol 2005; 20: 803– 08. 23. Prasad AN, Prasad C. The floppy infant: contribution of genetic and metabolic disorders. Brain Dev 2003; 25: 457– 476. 24. Aydinli N, Baslo B, Caliskan M, Ertas M, Ozmen M. Muscle ultrasonography and electromyography correlation for evaluation of floppy infants. Brain Dev 2003; 25: 22– 24. 25. Sender P, Jayawant S. Evaluation of the floppy infant. Curr Pediatr 2003; 13: 345– 49. 26. Richer LP, Shevell MI, Miller SP. Diagnostic profile of neonatal hypotonia: an 11-year study. Pediatr Neurol 2001; 25: 32– 37. 27. Brown RH Jr, Grant E, Pierson CR. Case 35-2006: a newborn boy with hypotonia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2132– 42. 28. D’Angelo MG, Bresolin N. Cognitive impairment in neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve 2006; 34: 16– 33. 􀁔􀁛􀁡􀁟􀁘􀁗􀁛􀁩􀁛􀁠􀁓􀀃􀁕􀁓􀀃􀁓􀁟􀁓􀁞􀁛􀇜􀁥􀀃􀁙􀁦􀁣􀁠􀁓􀁞􀁛􀀃􀀃􀂬􀀃􀀃􀁙􀁦􀁣􀁠􀁓􀁞􀀃􀁔􀁛􀁡􀁟􀁘􀁗􀁛􀁩􀁛􀁠􀁮􀀃􀁛􀀃􀁢􀁣􀁓􀁝􀁥􀁛􀁝􀁛􀀃􀀃􀂬􀀃􀀃􀀉􀀎􀀔􀀑􀀍􀉮􀀋􀀃􀀎􀀅􀀃􀉸􀀈􀀎􀀌􀀄􀉖􀀈􀉹􀀈􀀍􀀄􀀃􀉮􀀍􀉖􀀃􀀏􀀑􀉮􀉹􀀓􀀈􀉹􀀄 №6 | 2022 184 29. Menke LA, Poll-The BT, Clur SA, et al. Congenital heart defects in spinal muscular atrophy type I: a clinical report of two siblings and a review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 2008; 146: 740– 44. 30. Vaisar J, Sloane A, MacGregor DL, Ronen GM, Becker LE, Jay V. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenital due to congenital myasthenic syndrome. Pediatr Neurol 1995; 12: 237– 41. 31. Dubowitz LMS, Dubowitz V, Mercuri E. The Neurological Assessment of the Preterm and Full-term Newborn Infant. 2nd edn. Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 148. London: Mac Keith Press, 1999. 32. Campbell SK. The Test of Infant Motor Performance. Test User’s Manual Version 2. Chicago, IL: Infant Motor Performance Scales, LLC, 2005. 33. Harris SR, Megens A, Backman CL, Hayes VE. Development and standardization of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test. Infants Young Children 2003; 16: 143– 51. 34. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III). 3rd edn. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, 2006.